Governance & Capability (GCI)
Governance and capability provide the enabling environment for sustainable digital transformation. Structures exist in many MDAs, but skills, budget protection and policy enforcement vary widely.
- Prioritised, funded roadmaps (not “project-of-the-month”).
- Standardised controls (security, data, records, procurement).
- Delivery predictability via steering, KPIs, and accountability.
Start by strengthening decision rights: clarify who approves standards, budgets, and architectures, then build the “delivery spine” (steering + roadmap + KPIs).
How to interpret GCI
Governance Structures
Prevalence of key enabling structures across MDAs.
Interpretation
- Leadership roles are relatively common, but steering and roadmaps are less prevalent.
- Where steering committees are missing, prioritisation becomes reactive and project outcomes become inconsistent.
- Roadmaps (and architecture guardrails) are key to reducing duplication and vendor lock-in.
Starter governance package
- Named accountable CIO/ICT head with clear mandate.
- Quarterly steering committee with a published decision log.
- 12–18 month roadmap aligned to service priorities.
- Ring-fenced budget lines and procurement plan tied to roadmap.
Digital Skills Profile
Self-reported ICT skills distribution (from assessment).
High proportion of basic/moderate capability can limit secure delivery, integration, and operations.
- BAU ops + security coverage
- Integration + data skills
- Product / service delivery capability
Create a shared “tiger team” pool for high-need MDAs: integration, security, and delivery coaching.
Suggested capability ladder
Policy Adoption
Reported policy adoption across MDAs.
Adoption is a starting point. Real impact requires operational controls: audits, incident reporting, access reviews, retention schedules, and clear accountability for exceptions.
- Cybersecurity (minimum controls + incident workflow)
- Data protection (classification + processing controls)
- BCP/DR (critical services + tested recovery)
Recommended Actions
Strengthen governance “spine” and capability so digital investments become repeatable, secure, and measurable.
Define who approves architectures, standards, budgets, and platform choices — and publish decisions.
- Steering charter
- Decision log
- Architecture guardrails
Ring-fence critical spend and align procurement to roadmap milestones (avoid “one-off” projects).
- Roadmap-linked budget lines
- Lifecycle O&M included
- Vendor performance KPIs
Improve delivery capacity quickly via shared teams and common tooling (security, integration, data).
- Cross-MDA delivery “tiger teams”
- Training aligned to service priorities
- Standard platform patterns
Starter 90-day governance cadence
- Confirm CIO/ICT mandate + decision rights
- Stand up steering committee + agenda
- Baseline policy gaps & critical controls
- Publish roadmap and KPIs
- Align ring-fenced budget to roadmap
- Launch shared capability support (security/integration)
- First governance review cycle
- Audit policy enforcement (samples)
- Adjust roadmap based on delivery evidence
Note: Percentages reflect reported ranges and assessment synthesis; use as directional indicators for prioritisation.